Mate selection is the most important event in the life of a person. Various factors influence this process round the globe such as educational background, parental influence, religion and occupation, etc (Maliki, 1999). In most societies, the mate-selection process involves what social scientists call a marriage market (Anderson, 1994).
To describe men and women's differential preferences in mate selection, I am going to use the following theories: 1) sexual selection theory, 2) parental investment theory, and 3) social learning theory, and 4) sexual strategies theory. All of these theories have been used to explain why men and women have differential preferences in mate.Evolutionary approaches explain human behaviour in terms of adaptiveness and reproductive success. These approaches argue that if a behavioural feature (for example, aggression) has been genetically inherited by one generation from another, then it must have a specific value for human species; it might either help humans adapt better to the environment and survive (natural selection) or might.One of the problems I have with most accounts of human sexual selection starts here. The phrase 'mate choice' presupposes that mates are the ones doing the choosing. In most species this framework works out most of the time, but in humans it hits a snag. Humans are not frictionless, autonomous mate calculators on two legs.
Sexual selection acts on an organism's ability to obtain (often by any means necessary!) or successfully copulate with a mate. Selection makes many organisms go to extreme lengths for sex: peacocks (top left) maintain elaborate tails, elephant seals (top right) fight over territories, fruit flies perform dances, and some species deliver persuasive gifts.
David Buss (1989, 2003) has proposed a controversial evolutionary perspective to describe the process of mate selection. Critically analyze this evolutionary perspective. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of this theory as it relates to understanding human mate selection.
Buss, David M. 1989. “Sex Differences in Human Mate Preferences: Evolutionary Hypotheses Tested in 37 Cultures.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
ELSEVIER The Evolutionary Psychology of Physical Attractiveness: Sexual Selection and Human Morphology Nigel Barber Birmingham-Southern College Psychological evidence suggests that sex differences in morphology have been modified by sexual selection so as to attract mates (intersexual selection) or intimidate rivals (intrasexual selection).
Human mate choice and the wedding ring effect.. and willingness of mate selection.. This essay argues that there are consequences of female intrasexual mate competition that may be both.
Since the past several generations, the world, especially the American generation has witness drastic changes in dating, mate selection, and divorce. Societies and cultures all over the world have been experiencing changes in ideas related to these subjects.
He termed this the 'International Mate Selection Project', and aimed to see if there were certain universal traits which influenced mate selection worldwide (if a trait is evolved, then we would expect it to be universal - to be present to some degree in all human populations.
Key Study: Mate preference across cultures (Buss, 1989) A cross-cultural study on attraction and mate preference. Travis Dixon November 28, 2018 Biological Psychology, Human Relationships, Love and Marriage Leave a Comment.
The Human behavior is changing with the increasing factors in the world where environmental factors of an individual also affect the behavior of a human being. There are discussions carried out to make the full description of the human social behavior and challenges which are faced by the company due to various kinds of human social behavior.
Meta-Analysis of Menstrual Cycle Effects on Women’s Mate Preferences Wendy Wood, Laura Kressel, Priyanka D. Joshi, and Brian Louie Emotion Review 2014 6: 3, 229-249.
A Cross-Cultural Study of Perceived Social Network Influence in Mate Selection Shuangyue Zhang and Susan L. Kline Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 2009 40: 1, 3-23.
Modern evolutionary thinking has progressed beyond such a simple analysis, in part because evidence from comparative studies of primates questions whether human sex differences originated in sexual selection. The human male-female size difference is low in magnitude compared with other primate species, and species with low dimorphism have a.
Here you should focus on sexual selection and the evolutionary origins of mate choice. Sexual selection refers to the evolutionary process through which physical and psychological mechanisms that are beneficial to reproductive success will become more common across the species. There are two means through which sexual selection can occur. The first is intrasexual selection, which refers to.
View Essay - 285 essay.docx from PSY 285 at Murdoch University. 1 Running head: THE PERSPECTIVE OF SOCIOCULTURAL AND EVOLUTIONRY ON HUMAN MATE PREFERENCS The Perspective of Sociocultural and.